Doctors are much better than symptom-checker programs at reaching a correct diagnosis, though the humans are not perfect and might benefit from using such platforms to supplement their skills, a small study suggests. (Reuters Health)
In a head-to-head comparison, human doctors with access to the same information about medical history and symptoms as was put into a symptom checker got the diagnosis right 72 percent of the time, compared to 34 percent for the apps.
The 23 online symptom checkers, some accessed via websites and others available as apps, included those offered by Web MD and the Mayo Clinic in the U.S.
“The current symptom checkers, I was not surprised do not outperform doctors,” said senior author Dr. Ateev Mehrotra of Harvard Medical School in Boston.
But in reality computers and human doctors may both be involved in a diagnosis, rather than pitted against each other, Mehrotra told.
The researchers used a web platform called Human Dx to distribute 45 clinical sets of medical history and symptom information - to 234 physicians. Doctors could not do a physical examination on the hypothetical patient or run tests, they had only the information provided.
Doctors submitted their answers as free text responses with potential diagnoses ranked in order of likelihood.
Compared to putting the same information into symptom checkers, physicians ranked the correct diagnosis first more often for every case.
Doctors also got it right more often for the more serious conditions and the more uncommon diagnoses, while computer algorithms were better at spotting less serious conditions and more common diagnoses, according to the results published in a research letter in JAMA Internal Medicine.
“In medical school, we are taught to consider broad differential diagnoses that include rare conditions, and to consider life-threatening diagnoses,”
“National board exams also assess our abilities to recognize rare and ‘can’t miss’ diagnoses, so perhaps the clinicians have been conditioned to look for these diagnoses,” he said.
“Physicians do get it wrong 10 to 15 percent of the time, so maybe if computers were augmenting them the outcome would be better,” Dr Mehrotra said.
Computers may be better suited to amend or reorder diagnoses based on new information in certain settings, like the emergency room, he added.
“Patients need to know that most (symptom checkers) have limited accuracy, and should not be considered a substitute for a history and physical examination by a healthcare provider,” said Dr. Leslie an orthopedician.
So remember, these online search results have got very limited value in telling you your disease because they work by symptoms and it is difficult for them put an analyses based on multiple symptoms, whereas a doctor can do that perfectly.
Title – A title can be anything from a question, a heading of the article, or even the main topic about which you are publishing the post.
Description – It is explaining and adding the details about the topic you are posting. If you are asking a Question, then adding details is not necessary.
Photo, Video – You can attach a photo related to your post or can even publish a YOUTUBE video.
Sharing – Your name gets automatically attached behind the title of the article when you share is on Facebook or other platforms.
Eg: If a user John Watson have posted an article with the Title “How to handle Migraine without medicines?” and then if anyone share it on Facebook, the title will be like this :
“How to handle Migraine without medicines?”- John Watson
Themes of publishing or asking – You can publish from various themes that we mentioned and if any topic is missing among them, you can still post anything related to the Health. Healthcare is the only broad theme.